kirin 810 vs snapdragon 710

Snapdragon680 SM6225 Kirin 810 Hi6280: Announced: October 2021 June 2019: CPU & GPU . CPU: 4x 2.4 GHz - Kryo 265 Gold Cortex-A73 4x 1.9 GHz - Kryo 265 Silver Cortex-A53 2 ARM Cortex-A76@2.27GHz 6 ARM Cortex-A55@1.88GHz: GPU: Adreno 610 ARM's Mali-G52 MP6: Process: 6nm 7nm: Core: Octa-core Octa-Core: TheHiSilicon Kirin 710A is a ARM-based mid-range Octa-Core-SoC for Android based smartphones and tablets. It is based on the Kirin 710 , but manufactured in 14nm FinFET at SMIC (China) versus the Cpu基准规格和测试 HiSilicon Kirin 710 vs. Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 - Geekbench 5, Cinebench R20, Cinebench R15 and FP32 iGPU (GFLOPS) HiSilicon Kirin 710 vs HiSilicon Kirin 810. Samsung Exynos 9611 vs HiSilicon Kirin 710. Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 vs HiSilicon Kirin 710. QualcommSnapdragon 780G has Adreno 642 GPU with GPU Frequency as 490 MHz. Dynamic frequency allows the processor to conserve power and reduce noise when it is under a light load. HiSilicon Kirin 710 has Mali-G51 GPU with GPU Frequency as 1000 MHz. Memory Comparison: First chipset has max size of 12 GB and HiSilicon Kirin 710 has max size of 12 GB. 04and "Hidden" M If you compare Huawei Kirin 9000 vs Snapdragon 888 specs sheet, they have [] 36GHz and ARM Cortex-A53 4-Core @ 1 Huawei launched the first chip with 7nm architecture with the Kirin 980 This highly efficient, flexible, and programmable AI processor delivers 22 [email protected] and 11 [email protected] with just 8 W of Site De Rencontre Pour Les Ado 12 18 Gratuitement. VS We compared two 8-core processors HiSilicon Kirin 810 with Mali-G52 MP6 graphics and Kirin 710 Mali-G51 MP4. Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench. ReviewDifferencesBenchmarksAnTuTu v9GeekBench 5GamingSpecsComments Review General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators CPU Performance Single and multi-core processor tests Gaming Performance GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan Battery life Efficiency of battery consumption NanoReview Score Overall chip score Key Differences Main differences and advantages of each chip Pros of HiSilicon Kirin 810 Performs better in floating-point computationsShows significantly better up to 89% AnTuTu 9 score – 369K vs 195KHas a smaller size transistor 7 versus 12 nmAnnounced 11-months laterBetter instruction set architecture Pros of HiSilicon Kirin 710 Higher GPU frequency ~22% Benchmarks Performance tests in popular benchmarks AnTuTu 9 The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios CPU 109064 70901 GPU 95721 33222 Memory 72097 33714 UX 91820 57642 Total score 369603 195658 Submit your AnTuTu result GeekBench 5 The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance Image compression - Mpixels/s Face detection - images/s Speech recognition - words/s Machine learning - images/s Camera shooting - images/s HTML 5 - Mnodes/s SQLite - Krows/s 3DMark A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan Metal 3DMark Wild Life Performance Stability 99% 84% Graphics test 8 FPS 3 FPS Score 1421 554 Gaming Table of average FPS and graphics settings in mobile games PUBG Mobile 30 FPS [High] 51 FPS [Medium] Call of Duty Mobile 41 FPS [Ultra] 29 FPS [Low] Fortnite 29 FPS [Medium] 25 FPS [Low] Shadowgun Legends 43 FPS [Ultra] 56 FPS [Low] World of Tanks Blitz 59 FPS [Ultra] 52 FPS [Ultra] Mobile Legends Bang Bang 60 FPS [Ultra] 60 FPS [Ultra] Device Huawei Honor 9X 1080 x 2340 Huawei Honor 10 Lite 1080 x 2340 We provide average results. FPS may differ, depending on game version, OS and other factors. Specifications Full list of technical specifications of Kirin 810 and Kirin 710 CPU Architecture 2x GHz – Cortex-A766x GHz – Cortex-A55 4x GHz – Cortex-A734x GHz – Cortex-A53 Cores 8 8 Frequency 2270 MHz 2200 MHz Instruction set ARMv8-A L1 cache 256 KB 256 KB L2 cache 1 MB 512 KB L3 cache - 1 MB Process 7 nanometers 12 nanometers Transistor count billion billion TDP 5 W 5 W Graphics GPU name Mali-G52 MP6 Mali-G51 MP4 Architecture Rogue Bifrost GPU frequency 820 MHz 1000 MHz Execution units 6 4 Shading units 96 64 FLOPS 551 Gigaflops Gigaflops Vulkan version OpenCL version DirectX version 12 12 Memory Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR4X Memory frequency 2133 MHz 1866 MHz Bus 4x 16 Bit 2x 32 Bit Max bandwidth Gbit/s - Max size 8 GB 6 GB Multimedia ISP Neural processor NPU Yes No Storage type eMMC UFS eMMC UFS Max display resolution 3840 x 2160 2340 x 1080 Max camera resolution 1x 48MP, 2x 20MP 1x 40MP, 2x 24MP Video capture 1K at 30FPS 1K at 30FPS Video playback 1080p at 60FPS 1080p at 60FPS Video codecs VP8, VP9 Audio codecs AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV Connectivity 4G support LTE Cat. 12 LTE Cat. 12 5G support No No Download speed Up to 600 Mbps Up to 600 Mbps Upload speed Up to 150 Mbps Up to 150 Mbps Wi-Fi 6 4 Bluetooth Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo Cast your vote So, which SoC would you choose? Related Comparisons Comments Please give your opinion on the comparison of Kirin 710 and Kirin 810, or ask any questions VS We compared two 8-core processors Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 with Adreno 630 graphics and HiSilicon Kirin 710 Mali-G51 MP4. Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench. ReviewDifferencesBenchmarksAnTuTu v9GeekBench 5GamingSpecsComments Review General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators CPU Performance Single and multi-core processor tests Gaming Performance GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan Battery life Efficiency of battery consumption NanoReview Score Overall chip score Key Differences Main differences and advantages of each chip Pros of Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 Performs better in floating-point computationsShows significantly better up to AnTuTu 9 score – 405K vs 195KHas 1 MB larger L3 cache size than the Kirin 71027% higher CPU clock speed 2800 vs 2200 MHzHas a smaller size transistor 10 versus 12 nmBetter instruction set architecture Pros of HiSilicon Kirin 710 Higher GPU frequency ~41%Announced 8-months later Benchmarks Performance tests in popular benchmarks AnTuTu 9 The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios CPU 102331 70901 GPU 154456 33222 Memory 57724 33714 UX 87647 57642 Total score 405551 195658 Submit your AnTuTu result GeekBench 5 The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance Image compression Mpixels/s Mpixels/s Face detection images/s images/s Speech recognition words/s words/s Machine learning images/s images/s Camera shooting images/s images/s HTML 5 Mnodes/s Mnodes/s SQLite Krows/s Krows/s 3DMark A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan Metal 3DMark Wild Life Performance Stability 81% 84% Graphics test 8 FPS 3 FPS Score 1438 554 Gaming Table of average FPS and graphics settings in mobile games PUBG Mobile 53 FPS [Ultra] 51 FPS [Medium] Call of Duty Mobile 55 FPS [High] 29 FPS [Low] Fortnite 28 FPS [Ultra] 25 FPS [Low] Shadowgun Legends 48 FPS [High] 56 FPS [Low] World of Tanks Blitz 60 FPS [Ultra] 52 FPS [Ultra] Mobile Legends Bang Bang 56 FPS [Ultra] 60 FPS [Ultra] Device Xiaomi Pocophone F1 1080 x 2246 Huawei Honor 10 Lite 1080 x 2340 We provide average results. FPS may differ, depending on game version, OS and other factors. Specifications Full list of technical specifications of Snapdragon 845 and Kirin 710 CPU Architecture 4x GHz – Kryo 385 Gold Cortex-A754x GHz – Kryo 385 Silver Cortex-A55 4x GHz – Cortex-A734x GHz – Cortex-A53 Cores 8 8 Frequency 2800 MHz 2200 MHz Instruction set ARMv8-A L1 cache 128 KB 256 KB L2 cache 256 KB 512 KB L3 cache 2 MB 1 MB Process 10 nanometers 12 nanometers Transistor count 3 billion billion TDP 9 W 5 W Graphics GPU name Adreno 630 Mali-G51 MP4 Architecture Adreno 600 Bifrost GPU frequency 710 MHz 1000 MHz Execution units 2 4 Shading units 256 64 FLOPS 727 Gigaflops Gigaflops Vulkan version OpenCL version DirectX version 12 12 Memory Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR4X Memory frequency 1866 MHz 1866 MHz Bus 2x 32 Bit 2x 32 Bit Max bandwidth Gbit/s - Max size 8 GB 6 GB Multimedia ISP Neural processor NPU Hexagon 685 No Storage type UFS eMMC UFS Max display resolution 3840 x 2160 2340 x 1080 Max camera resolution 1x 192MP 1x 40MP, 2x 24MP Video capture 4K at 60FPS 1K at 30FPS Video playback 4K at 60FPS 1080p at 60FPS Video codecs VP9 VP8, VP9 Audio codecs AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV Connectivity Modem X20 - 4G support LTE Cat. 18 LTE Cat. 12 5G support No No Download speed Up to 1200 Mbps Up to 600 Mbps Upload speed Up to 150 Mbps Up to 150 Mbps Wi-Fi 5 4 Bluetooth Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo Cast your vote So, which SoC would you choose? Snapdragon 845 84 Total votes 111 Related Comparisons Comments Please give your opinion on the comparison of Kirin 710 and Snapdragon 845, or ask any questions 56 características comparadasHiSilicon Kirin 710Qualcomm Snapdragon 710Por que HiSilicon Kirin 710 é melhor que Qualcomm Snapdragon 710?CPU mais rápida?4 x & 4 x x & 6 x RAM 334MHz maior?2200MHzvs1866MHzPossui NX bit?2 versão/versões mais recentes de VFP?4vs2Por que Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 é melhor que HiSilicon Kirin 710?Semicondutor 2nm menor?10nmvs12nmClock do GPU 100MHz mais rápido?750MHzvs650MHzDownloads mais rápidos?800MBits/svs600MBits/s2GB a mais de tamanho máximo de memória?8GBvs6GBAvaliações de usuáriosClassificação geralHiSilicon Kirin 7105 Avaliações de usuáriosHiSilicon Kirin Avaliações de usuáriosQualcomm Snapdragon 7104 Avaliações de usuáriosQualcomm Snapdragon Avaliações de usuáriosRecursoInformações geraisUm sistema operacional 32-bit pode suportar, no máximo, 4GB de RAM. Sistemas 64-bit permite mais do que 4GB, proporcionando maior desempenho. Também é possível executar aplicativos uma placa de vídeo integrada, você não precisa comprar uma placa pequenos proporcionam melhor desempenho e menor consumo de energia. Chipsets com um maior número de transistores, componentes semicondutores de dispositivos eletrônicos, oferecem mais poder computacional. Um fator de forma pequeno permite que mais transistores se encaixem em um chip, aumentando, assim, seu unidade de processamento gráfico GPU tem uma velocidade de clock mais DirectX é usado em games, com as versões mais novas suportando gráficos tecnologia sem fio 5G. A rede móvel de quinta geração oferece velocidades mais altas e latência menor do que a rede de quarta geração GPU Desconhecido. Ajude-nos sugerindo um valor. HiSilicon Kirin 710 Desconhecido. Ajude-nos sugerindo um valor. Qualcomm Snapdragon 710Quando a GPU está rodando abaixo de suas limitações, ela pode aumentar a velocidade para um clock superior a fim de fornecer desempenho OpenGL ES é usado para games em dispositivos móveis, tais como smartphones. As versões mais recentes suportam gráficos aplicativos usam OpenCL para desfrutar do poder da unidade de processamento de gráficos GPU para computação não gráfica. As versões mais recentes introduzem mais funcionalidade e melhor velocidade da CPU ou processador indica quantos ciclos de processamento podem ser executados por uma CPU a cada segundo, considerando todos os seus núcleos unidades de processamento. Essa velocidade é calculada pela soma da capacidade de cada núcleo – ou, no caso de processadores multinúcleos que empregam diferentes microarquiteturas, de cada grupo de threads resulta em desempenho mais rápido e melhor a tecnologia um chip pode alternar entre dois conjuntos de núcleos de processador, a fim de maximizar o desempenho do aparelho e a duração da bateria. Durante uma partida de jogo, por exemplo, os núcleos mais potentes são utilizados para otimizar a performance, enquanto o ato de checar e-mails aciona núcleos menos potentes para prolongar a duração da Multiprocessamento Heterogêneo HMP - "Heterogenous Multi-Processing" é uma versão mais avançada da tecnologia Nesta configuração, o processador pode utilizar todos os núcleos ao mesmo tempo, ou apenas um núcleo para tarefas de baixa intensidade. Isso pode, respectivamente, fornecer desempenho mais potente ou prolongar a duração da a CPU estiver rodando abaixo de suas limitações, ela pode acelerar a velocidade de clock para oferecer desempenho L2 Desconhecido. Ajude-nos sugerindo um valor. HiSilicon Kirin 710 Desconhecido. Ajude-nos sugerindo um valor. Qualcomm Snapdragon 710Um cache L2 maior resulta em uma CPU mais rápida e no sistema como um L1 Desconhecido. Ajude-nos sugerindo um valor. Qualcomm Snapdragon 710Um cache L1 maior resulta em uma CPU mais rápida e no sistema como um de clock Desconhecido. Ajude-nos sugerindo um valor. HiSilicon Kirin 710 Desconhecido. Ajude-nos sugerindo um valor. Qualcomm Snapdragon 710O multiplicador de clock controla a velocidade da L3 Desconhecido. Ajude-nos sugerindo um valor. HiSilicon Kirin 710 Desconhecido. Ajude-nos sugerindo um valor. Qualcomm Snapdragon 710Um cache L3 maior resulta em uma CPU mais rápida e no sistema como um suportar memória mais rápida, fornecendo melhor desempenho ao memória DDR Double Data Rate é o tipo mais comum de memória RAM. As versões mais recentes de memória DDR suportam velocidades máximas mais altas e consomem menos quantidade máxima de memória RAM.Esta é a taxa máxima de dados que podem ser lidos ou armazenados na canais de memória aumenta a velocidade de transferência de dados entre a memória e a eMMC Desconhecido. Ajude-nos sugerindo um valor. Qualcomm Snapdragon 710Um versão mais elevada de eMMC permite interfaces de memória mais rápidos, o que tem um efeito positivo no desempenho do dispositivo. Por exemplo, quando transfere arquivos de seu computador para um armazenamento interno usando código corretor de erros de memória pode detectar e corrigir dados corrompidos. Ele é usado quando é essencial evitar corrupção, tal como em computação científica ou ao se executar um sistema em um chip SoC tem um chip celular LTE integrado. O LTE é capaz de fazer downloads a velocidades mais rápidas do que a antiga tecnologia velocidade de download é uma medida da largura de banda da conexão à internet, representando a taxa máxima de transferência de dados em que um dispositivo pode acessar conteúdo velocidade de upload é uma medida da largura de banda da conexão à internet, representando a taxa máxima de transferência de dados em que um dispositivo pode enviar informações para um servidor ou outro tecnologia integrada no processador para proteger o dispositivo para uso com ferramentas como pagamentos móveis e streaming de vídeo usando gerenciamento de direitos digitais DRM.A tecnologia multithreading como Hyperthreading da Intel ou Multithreading Simultâneo da AMD fornece um maior desempenho dividindo cada um dos núcleos físicos do processador em núcleos virtuais, também conhecidos como threads. Dessa forma, cada núcleo pode executar dois fluxos de instruções ao mesmo bit ajuda a proteger o computador de ataques fornece aceleração para processamento de mídia, tal como escutar AES é usado para acelerar a criptografia e a Floating-Point VFP é usado pelo processador para entregar desempenho aumentado em áreas tais como imagem 5 é um benchmark multiplataforma que mede o desempenho de núcleo único de um processador. Fonte Primate Labs, 2023Geekbench 5 é um benchmark multiplataforma que mede o desempenho de múltiplos núcleos de um processador. Fonte Primate Labs, 2023resultado PassMark Desconhecido. Ajude-nos sugerindo um valor. HiSilicon Kirin 710 Desconhecido. Ajude-nos sugerindo um valor. Qualcomm Snapdragon 710Este índice de referência mede o desempenho da CPU usando múltiplas PassMark único Desconhecido. Ajude-nos sugerindo um valor. HiSilicon Kirin 710 Desconhecido. Ajude-nos sugerindo um valor. Qualcomm Snapdragon 710Este índice de referência mede o desempenho da CPU usando uma única PassMark em overclock Desconhecido. Ajude-nos sugerindo um valor. HiSilicon Kirin 710 Desconhecido. Ajude-nos sugerindo um valor. Qualcomm Snapdragon 710Este índice de referência mede o desempenho da CPU enquanto ela está com Snapdragon 8 Gen 2Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1MediaTek Dimensity 9200 PlusQualcomm Snapdragon 7c Plus Gen 3Exibir tudo HiSilicon Kirin 810 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 vs HiSilicon Kirin 820HiSilicon Kirin 810 ► remove from comparisonThe HiSilicon Kirin 810 is a ARM-based mid-range Octa-Core-SoC for Android based smartphones and tablets. It was announced mid 2019 and contains 8 processor cores. Two fast ARM Cortex-A76 cores with up to GHz and six small power efficient ARM Cortex-A55 cores with up to GHz bigLITTLE. Furthermore, the SoC integrates a mid range graphics card called ARM Mali-G52 MP6 with 6 clusters. For AI acceleration, the Kirin 810 integrates a Ascend D100 Lite NPU Da Vinci architecture. The integrates LTE modem supports with Dual Sim VoLTE. For photography, the Kirin 810 integrates the Kirin The memory controller supports LPDDR4X at up to 2133 MHz. Furthermore, WiFi and Bluetooth are integrated in the chip. The SoC is manufactured in the modern 7nm process at TSMC and therefore should be very energy Snapdragon 710 ► remove from comparisonThe Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 SD710 is a fast mid-range ARM-based SoC largely found on Android tablets and smartphones. Announced in early 2018, the SD710 is the first of the 700 series and positions itself between the 600 series Snapdragon 660 and 800 series Snapdragon 845. It integrates 8 Kryo 360 cores devided in two big cores most likely based on Cortex-A75 at up to GHz and six small cores most likely based on Coretx-A55 at up to GHz. The memory controller supports LPDDR4X and the integrated graphics card is called Adreno 616. The X15 LTE modem supports 4x4 MIMO with up to 800 MBbit/s download and 150 MBit/s upload. Compared to the older Snapdragon 660, Qualcomm advertises the CPU clusters to be up to 20% faster and the GPU up to 35 %. The Snapdragon 710 is manufactured in the modern 10 nm process at Samsung 10LPP.HiSilicon Kirin 820 ► remove from comparisonThe HiSilicon Kirin 820 is a ARM-based mid-range Octa-Core-SoC for Android based smartphones and tablets. It was announced mid 2020 and contains 8 processor cores. One fast ARM Cortex-A76 core with up to GHz, three addition A76 cores at up to as the old Kirin 810 and four efficiency Cortex-A55 cores at up to GHz. Furthermore, the SoC integrates a 5G modem and a fast mid-range ARM Mali-G57 MP6 graphics card. For AI acceleration, the Kirin 820 integrates a DaVinci NPU. The performance of the CPU part in our tests was slightly higher than the old Kirin 810 thanks to the fast performance core. Huawei advertises 27% performance advantage for the CPU. The NPU and GPU have bigger performance gains with 73% and 38% more power. The chip should also integrate Bluetooth 5 and WiFi 6. The SoC is manufactured in the modern 7nm process at TSMC and therefore should be very energy Kirin 810Qualcomm Snapdragon 710HiSilicon Kirin 820SeriesHiSilicon Qualcomm SnapdragonHiSilicon CodenameCortex-A76/-A55Kryo 360Cortex-A76/-A55Series Cortex-A76/-A55HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G - GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A76/-A55HiSilicon Kirin 990 - GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A76/-A55HiSilicon Kirin - GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A76/-A55HiSilicon Kirin - GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A76/-A55HiSilicon Kirin 810 - GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A76/-A55HiSilicon Kirin 980 - GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A76/-A55HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G - GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A76/-A55HiSilicon Kirin 990 - GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A76/-A55HiSilicon Kirin 820 - GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A76/-A55HiSilicon Kirin - GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A76/-A55HiSilicon Kirin - GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A76/-A55HiSilicon Kirin 980 - GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A76/-A55Clock1880 - 2270 MHz2200 MHz1840 - 2360 MHzCores / Threads8 / 88 / 88 / 8Technology7 nm10 nm7 nmFeaturesARM Mali-G52 MP6 GPU, 2x Cortex-A76 GHz + 6x Cortex-A55 GHz, LTE Cat-12 1400 Mbps Downlink, Cat-13 200 Mbps Uplink, Bluetooth 5, WiFi a/b/g/n/ac, AGPS, Glonass, BaidouAdreno 612 GPU, X15 LTE Modem, Hexagon 685 DSP, Specra 250 ISP, GPS, GLONASS, SBAS, Beidou, GalileoARM Mali-G52 MP6 GPU, 1x Cortex-A76 up to GHz, 3x A76 nup to GHz, 4x A55 up to GHz, 5G TDD/FDD, Bluetooth 5, WiFi 6, AGPS, Glonass, BaidouiGPUARM Mali-G52 MP6Qualcomm Adreno 616ARM Mali-G57 MP6ArchitectureARMARMARMAnnounced ManufacturerQualcomm Snapdragon SD 710HiSilicon Kirin 820BenchmarksPerformance Rating - Geekbench PCM Work, Sling Shot Physics, Antutu v8 CPU - Kirin 810 Performance Rating - Geekbench PCM Work, Sling Shot Physics, Antutu v8 CPU - SD 710 Performance Rating - Geekbench PCM Work, Sling Shot Physics, Antutu v8 CPU - Kirin 820 3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physicsmin 18123 avg 23401 median 24426 21% max 27654 Points min 13595 avg 14925 median 12% max 18181 Points 3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme ES Unlimited Physicsmin 3501 avg 3731 median 3720 47% max 3972 Points min 1840 avg 2330 median 2477 31% max 2720 Points 3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot ES Unlimited Physicsmin 3463 avg 3749 median 3782 54% max 4003 Points min 1862 avg 2362 median 35% max 2634 Points Geekbench - Geekbench - 64 Bit Single-Coremin 592 avg 598 median 598 26% max 604 Points min 392 avg 393 median 393 17% max 394 Points Geekbench - Geekbench - 64 Bit Multi-Coremin 1890 avg 1920 median 7% max 1949 Points min 1448 avg 1478 median 1478 5% max 1508 Points Geekbench - Geekbench 64 Bit Single-CoreGeekbench - Geekbench 64 Bit Multi-CoreGeekbench - - Geekbench - 64 Bit Single-Coremin 1799 avg 1819 median 1821 19% max 1833 Points Geekbench - - Geekbench - 64 Bit Multi-Coremin 5754 avg 5843 median 7% max 5917 Points Geekbench - Geekbench 64 Bit Single-Coremin 1835 avg 1858 median 1858 26% max 1881 Points Geekbench - Geekbench 64 Bit Multi-Coremin 5683 avg 5800 median 14% max 5916 Points Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-CoreGeekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-CoreGeekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-CoreGeekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-CoreGeekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Streammin 787 avg 1443 median 1443 12% max 2099 Points Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memorymin 2565 avg 2600 median 24% max 2634 Points Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Pointmin 11443 avg 11547 median 23% max 11650 Points Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integermin 5224 avg 5235 median 11% max 5245 Points Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Scoremin 6446 avg 6539 median 6539 17% max 6632 Points Mozilla Kraken - Kraken Total Score *min 2472 avg 2950 median 2646 3% max 3731 ms min 3035 avg 3370 median 4% max 3800 ms Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Scoremin 15947 avg 16825 median 16604 16% max 17925 Points min 9771 avg 11817 median 12% max 12802 Points WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Scoremin 71 avg median 83 19% max 97 Points min 57 avg median 16% max 72 Points AnTuTu v6 - AnTuTu v6 Total Scoremin 135848 avg 136892 median 137134 47% max 137693 Points AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 MEMmin 3343 avg 6694 median 7636 23% max 8159 Points AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 UXmin 43917 avg 44744 median 44198 54% max 46663 Points AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 GPUmin 37446 avg 45655 median 47945 15% max 49284 Points AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 CPUmin 63606 avg 65473 median 40% max 66830 Points AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 Total Scoremin 155113 avg 162553 median 162918 29% max 169262 Points AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 UXmin 55189 avg 62040 median 58957 49% max 71973 Points min 7553 avg 26433 median 26433 22% max 45313 Points AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 MEMmin 45079 avg 53673 median 47554 38% max 68387 Points min 36796 avg 41477 median 41477 33% max 46158 Points AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 GPUmin 56693 avg 68299 median 64645 12% max 83558 Points min 49409 avg 52655 median 52655 10% max 55901 Points AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 CPUmin 92494 avg 97432 median 94457 34% max 105346 Points min 67712 avg 68330 median 68330 25% max 68948 Points AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 Total Scoremin 259370 avg 291444 median 295579 28% max 319383 Points min 172068 avg 188895 median 188895 18% max 205722 Points PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 CPU Testsmin 178496 avg 180262 median 180127 24% max 182163 Points PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Computer Visionmin 3402 avg 3476 median 3491 18% max 3518 Points PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storagemin 4719 avg 4933 median 10% max 5372 Points PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 7541 avg 8133 median 7695 50% max 9164 Points min 6453 avg 6824 median 44% max 7460 Points PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Scoremin 9189 avg 10361 median 9824 49% max 12070 Points min 7041 avg 8137 median 8201 41% max 9345 Points PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Battery Lifemin 368 avg 554 median 11% max 739 min Average Benchmarks HiSilicon Kirin 810 → 100% n=19Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 → 75% n=19Average Benchmarks HiSilicon Kirin 820 → 130% n=19 - Range of benchmark values for this graphics card - Average benchmark values for this graphics card* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance1 This benchmark is not used for the average 15. 1307520 checking url part for id 12116 +0s ... 0s 1 checking url part for id 10981 +0s ... 0s 2 checking url part for id 12581 +0s ... 0s 3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s 4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 12 Jun 2023 135518 +0200 + ... 5 composed specs + ... 6 did output specs +0s ... 7 getting avg benchmarks for device 12116 + ... 8 got single benchmarks 12116 + ... 9 getting avg benchmarks for device 10981 + ... 10 got single benchmarks 10981 + ... 11 getting avg benchmarks for device 12581 + ... 12 got single benchmarks 12581 + ... 13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 14 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values + ... 15 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values + ... 16 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values + ... 17 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values + ... 18 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values + ... 19 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values + ... 20 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values + ... 21 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values + ... 22 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values + ... 23 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values + ... 24 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values + ... 25 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values + ... 26 min, max, avg, median took s + ... 27 return log +0s ... HiSilicon Kirin 810 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 712HiSilicon Kirin 810 ► remove from comparisonThe HiSilicon Kirin 810 is a ARM-based mid-range Octa-Core-SoC for Android based smartphones and tablets. It was announced mid 2019 and contains 8 processor cores. Two fast ARM Cortex-A76 cores with up to GHz and six small power efficient ARM Cortex-A55 cores with up to GHz bigLITTLE. Furthermore, the SoC integrates a mid range graphics card called ARM Mali-G52 MP6 with 6 clusters. For AI acceleration, the Kirin 810 integrates a Ascend D100 Lite NPU Da Vinci architecture. The integrates LTE modem supports with Dual Sim VoLTE. For photography, the Kirin 810 integrates the Kirin The memory controller supports LPDDR4X at up to 2133 MHz. Furthermore, WiFi and Bluetooth are integrated in the chip. The SoC is manufactured in the modern 7nm process at TSMC and therefore should be very energy Snapdragon 710 ► remove from comparisonThe Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 SD710 is a fast mid-range ARM-based SoC largely found on Android tablets and smartphones. Announced in early 2018, the SD710 is the first of the 700 series and positions itself between the 600 series Snapdragon 660 and 800 series Snapdragon 845. It integrates 8 Kryo 360 cores devided in two big cores most likely based on Cortex-A75 at up to GHz and six small cores most likely based on Coretx-A55 at up to GHz. The memory controller supports LPDDR4X and the integrated graphics card is called Adreno 616. The X15 LTE modem supports 4x4 MIMO with up to 800 MBbit/s download and 150 MBit/s upload. Compared to the older Snapdragon 660, Qualcomm advertises the CPU clusters to be up to 20% faster and the GPU up to 35 %. The Snapdragon 710 is manufactured in the modern 10 nm process at Samsung 10LPP.Qualcomm Snapdragon 712 ► remove from comparisonThe Qualcomm Snapdragon 712 SD712 is a fast mid-range ARM-based SoC largely found on Android tablets and smartphones. Compared to the Snapdragon 710 predecessor, the 712 offers a 10% faster CPU and GPU due to clock rate increases 100 MHz for the CPU It was announced early 2019 and positions itself between the 600 series Snapdragon 660 and 800 series Snapdragon 845. It integrates 8 Kryo 360 cores devided in two big cores most likely based on Cortex-A75 at up to GHz and six small cores most likely based on Coretx-A55 at up to or GHz. The memory controller supports LPDDR4X and the integrated graphics card is called Adreno 616. The X15 LTE modem supports 4x4 MIMO with up to 800 MBbit/s download and 150 MBit/s upload. The Snapdragon 712 is manufactured in the modern 10 nm process at Samsung 10LPP.ModelHiSilicon Kirin 810Qualcomm Snapdragon 710Qualcomm Snapdragon 712SeriesHiSilicon Qualcomm SnapdragonQualcomm SnapdragonCodenameCortex-A76/-A55Kryo 360Kryo 360Series Snapdragon Kryo 360HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G - GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A76/-A55HiSilicon Kirin 990 - GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A76/-A55HiSilicon Kirin - GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A76/-A55HiSilicon Kirin - GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A76/-A55HiSilicon Kirin 810 - GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A76/-A55HiSilicon Kirin 980 - GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A76/-A55Clock1880 - 2270 MHz2200 MHz2300 MHzCores / Threads8 / 88 / 88 / 8Technology7 nm10 nm10 nmFeaturesARM Mali-G52 MP6 GPU, 2x Cortex-A76 GHz + 6x Cortex-A55 GHz, LTE Cat-12 1400 Mbps Downlink, Cat-13 200 Mbps Uplink, Bluetooth 5, WiFi a/b/g/n/ac, AGPS, Glonass, BaidouAdreno 612 GPU, X15 LTE Modem, Hexagon 685 DSP, Specra 250 ISP, GPS, GLONASS, SBAS, Beidou, GalileoAdreno 616 GPU, X15 LTE Modem, Hexagon 685 DSP, Specra ISPiGPUARM Mali-G52 MP6Qualcomm Adreno 616Qualcomm Adreno 616ArchitectureARMARMARMAnnounced ManufacturerQualcomm Snapdragon SD 710Qualcomm Snapdragon SD 712BenchmarksPerformance Rating - Geekbench PCM Work, Sling Shot Physics, Antutu v8 CPU - Kirin 810 Performance Rating - Geekbench PCM Work, Sling Shot Physics, Antutu v8 CPU - SD 710 3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physicsmin 18123 avg 23401 median 24426 21% max 27654 Points min 13595 avg 14925 median 12% max 18181 Points min 13686 avg 13692 median 13692 12% max 13698 Points 3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme ES Unlimited Physicsmin 3501 avg 3731 median 3720 47% max 3972 Points min 1840 avg 2330 median 2477 31% max 2720 Points min 1982 avg 2244 median 2244 28% max 2506 Points 3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot ES Unlimited Physicsmin 3463 avg 3749 median 3782 54% max 4003 Points min 1862 avg 2362 median 35% max 2634 Points min 1946 avg 2226 median 2226 32% max 2506 Points Geekbench - Geekbench - 64 Bit Single-Coremin 592 avg 598 median 598 26% max 604 Points min 392 avg 393 median 393 17% max 394 Points Geekbench - Geekbench - 64 Bit Multi-Coremin 1890 avg 1920 median 7% max 1949 Points min 1448 avg 1478 median 1478 5% max 1508 Points Geekbench - Geekbench 64 Bit Single-CoreGeekbench - Geekbench 64 Bit Multi-CoreGeekbench - - Geekbench - 64 Bit Single-Coremin 1799 avg 1819 median 1821 19% max 1833 Points Geekbench - - Geekbench - 64 Bit Multi-Coremin 5754 avg 5843 median 7% max 5917 Points Geekbench - Geekbench 64 Bit Single-Coremin 1835 avg 1858 median 1858 26% max 1881 Points Geekbench - Geekbench 64 Bit Multi-Coremin 5683 avg 5800 median 14% max 5916 Points Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-CoreGeekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-CoreGeekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-CoreGeekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-CoreGeekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Streammin 787 avg 1443 median 1443 12% max 2099 Points Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memorymin 2565 avg 2600 median 24% max 2634 Points Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Pointmin 11443 avg 11547 median 23% max 11650 Points Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integermin 5224 avg 5235 median 11% max 5245 Points Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Scoremin 6446 avg 6539 median 6539 17% max 6632 Points Mozilla Kraken - Kraken Total Score *min 2472 avg 2950 median 2646 3% max 3731 ms min 3035 avg 3370 median 4% max 3800 ms min 2912 avg 3648 median 4% max 4383 ms Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Scoremin 15947 avg 16825 median 16604 16% max 17925 Points min 9771 avg 11817 median 12% max 12802 Points min 10328 avg 11945 median 11945 11% max 13562 Points WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Scoremin 71 avg median 83 19% max 97 Points min 57 avg median 16% max 72 Points min 47 avg median 14% max 72 Points AnTuTu v6 - AnTuTu v6 Total Scoremin 135848 avg 136892 median 137134 47% max 137693 Points AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 MEMmin 3343 avg 6694 median 7636 23% max 8159 Points AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 UXmin 43917 avg 44744 median 44198 54% max 46663 Points AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 GPUmin 37446 avg 45655 median 47945 15% max 49284 Points AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 CPUmin 63606 avg 65473 median 40% max 66830 Points AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 Total Scoremin 155113 avg 162553 median 162918 29% max 169262 Points AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 UXmin 55189 avg 62040 median 58957 49% max 71973 Points min 7553 avg 26433 median 26433 22% max 45313 Points AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 MEMmin 45079 avg 53673 median 47554 38% max 68387 Points min 36796 avg 41477 median 41477 33% max 46158 Points AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 GPUmin 56693 avg 68299 median 64645 12% max 83558 Points min 49409 avg 52655 median 52655 10% max 55901 Points AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 CPUmin 92494 avg 97432 median 94457 34% max 105346 Points min 67712 avg 68330 median 68330 25% max 68948 Points AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 Total Scoremin 259370 avg 291444 median 295579 28% max 319383 Points min 172068 avg 188895 median 188895 18% max 205722 Points PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 CPU Testsmin 178496 avg 180262 median 180127 24% max 182163 Points PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Computer Visionmin 3402 avg 3476 median 3491 18% max 3518 Points PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storagemin 4719 avg 4933 median 10% max 5372 Points PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 7541 avg 8133 median 7695 50% max 9164 Points min 6453 avg 6824 median 44% max 7460 Points min 6832 avg 7554 median 7554 49% max 8276 Points PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Scoremin 9189 avg 10361 median 9824 49% max 12070 Points min 7041 avg 8137 median 8201 41% max 9345 Points min 8346 avg 9745 median 49% max 11143 Points PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Battery Lifemin 368 avg 554 median 11% max 739 min Average Benchmarks HiSilicon Kirin 810 → 100% n=17Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 → 75% n=17Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Snapdragon 712 → 78% n=17 - Range of benchmark values for this graphics card - Average benchmark values for this graphics card* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance1 This benchmark is not used for the average 15. 1307520 checking url part for id 12116 +0s ... 0s 1 checking url part for id 10981 +0s ... 0s 2 checking url part for id 11301 +0s ... 0s 3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s 4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 12 Jun 2023 135518 +0200 + ... 5 composed specs + ... 6 did output specs +0s ... 7 getting avg benchmarks for device 12116 + ... 8 got single benchmarks 12116 + ... 9 getting avg benchmarks for device 10981 + ... 10 got single benchmarks 10981 + ... 11 getting avg benchmarks for device 11301 + ... 12 got single benchmarks 11301 + ... 13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 14 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values + ... 15 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values + ... 16 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values + ... 17 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values + ... 18 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values + ... 19 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values + ... 20 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values + ... 21 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values + ... 22 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values + ... 23 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values + ... 24 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values + ... 25 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values + ... 26 min, max, avg, median took s + ... 27 return log +0s ...

kirin 810 vs snapdragon 710